Wednesday, September 22, 2010

Essay 1 Feedback

Mid Level 3 - Roughly equates to a solid C.
Good first attempt at an A2 essay! Not easy I know. I would like you to add the detail about Karl Marx and the Revolution that never happened. This then links to Adorno's idea that the audience had become too passive to revolt. Remember the main issue Adorno had was with PASSIVITY and the audience not even knowing they were being controlled by the media into accepting what was on offer and believing they had a choice. Add this in.

Thursday, September 16, 2010

Media power vs People Power


In my essay I will be discussing the theories of Theodor Adorno and John Fiske and their views on ‘media power’. There are many other theorists who have study the effects of media on the audience but these two represent the complete opposite viewpoints of the debate, so they are the best two to use in this instance.

Adorno (September 11, 1903-August 6, 1969) came from Germany and was a member of the Frankfurt School of social theory along with Max Horkheimer, Walter Benjamin, Herbert Marcuse, Jürgen Habermas and others, these where all intellectuals. Adorno fled Germany in the 1930’s to America during the time of the rise of Nazi Germany. Adorno then went on to write a book with Max Horkheimer called ‘Dialectic of Enlightenment’ which contains the essay ‘The Culture Industry: Enlightenment as Mass Deception’. Both the writers had the view that the media had more power over the people. Adorno had called the ‘media industry’ the ‘culture industry’.

John Fiske is a media scholar who was a Professor of Communication Arts at the university of Wisconsin-Madison. He was born in 1939 in Britain and he graduated from Cambridge University. He had written 8 books in total such has ‘Power Plays, Power Works, Reading the Popular’ and ‘Understanding Popular Culture’. Fiske does not agree with the notion of ‘the mass audience’, which Adorno argued to believe instead Fiske believes that the audience are individuals and have unique tastes.

Adorno’s argument was that people (the audience) did not have their own culture but that they followed what the media had given them. A modern example to support Adorno’s argument is a band called ‘Axes of Awesome’ with their ‘4 chord’ song. In this song the band is able to put in nearly every hit music song and jumble them up but only use ‘4 chords’ to do this. The point in this song is that there is no difference between music types but that they all follow the same formula. Fiske’s argues that ‘the audience’ has a certain influence on the music that is produced by the media organization. He believes that ‘the audience’ has an identity and a choice of which type/genre of music they purchase and that not all music is the same. A modern example of this is Madonna and how her music changes frequently due to the trends at the time. Many people like Madonna for her ability to change styles and her type of music, this is a choice made by her fans, however some don't like every type of music she does and will choose not to support her by not buying her albums. This supports Fiske's view however Madonna changing her genre of music to suit the trends means that she is not being different and she is only singing what the media company want her to, this also supports Adorno's view on media culture and how the media is the 'Culture industry'.

Adorno was surprised when he arrived in America because of all the media productions that the people had just taken in, he was surprised of this because in Germany media was mainly fine arts and theater whilst in America it was cinema and broadway which Adorno believed to be all the same. A modern example to back this up is in the film 'Swordfish' where 'John Travolter' at the beginning basically says that hollywood just makes everything the same where there is always a happy ending for the good guy in the films. This supports Adornos idea of the media being a machine and just churning out the same thing time after time. This means that the audience does not have a say in what is produced and the story line of the film, but instead are lead to believe that the film is different and does not follow the same format of every other hollywood film. Fiske on the other hand believes that the people have the choice to watch or not watch the film's produce by hollywood and that there are different genres to the films just like in the music industry. Fiske's argument is that media is not all the same but does follow the same formula however the audience have the choice of what type of film they watch and how they like it to end.

In my opinion i believe that Adorno and Fiske have both got a very persuasive argument with many factors supporting their opinions and beliefs of the media, but i believe that it is impossible to determine who is write and wrong as the views of every person varies from people who believe in Adorno's view and people who believe in Fiske's view. I think that media does repeat a lot of the time but there are times where something new comes along something different wether it be in films or music from a film point of view you have the horror films such as 'Halloween' even though there have been many remakes which links in with Adorno's view, the good guy in it doesn't always win and it does not follow the conventional role of modern hollywood films which goes against Adorno view. This is mainly down to the director being more creative with his films. In the music industry you have many different genre types from heavy metal to R&B and they are they complete opposites so this is in more of Fiske's favour however many R&B songs have the same tune to it or talk about the same thing which proves Adorno to be right.

In conclusion Adorno and Fiske both have views on the media but believe in different things and I believe that Adorno is right in saying that the media does have power over the people as many people are subliminally persuaded by the media to buy things which they believe to be different such as music. Although I believe Fiske is right in saying that not all music and films are the same, and that people are individuals. I think that this argument will be continuous as people will always think and like different things and no-one will be the same as the next person.


Tuesday, September 14, 2010

Proposal Feedback

Very good [B+], lots of detail and a definite idea of what you want the film to say about young males. Use more media terms in your writing, an obvious one here is 'Representation' of young males.

Monday, September 13, 2010

Title: Sporting Life and expectations
Director:Ben Dickerson

Synopsis: For my short film i will be making a documentary on RWS rugby academy. This will be me following the through their training and school life and how they cope with the demands of training and keeping their grades up. I will be following a two of the main characters around school and whilst they are training and asking them about what they are finding difficult and what they like about it. The characters will be one who has been at the school all his secondary school life and one who had just come to the school, this is because it will give me two different points of views on the school and the rugby academy.

The documentary will start out with the undertone of the rugby coach shouting at the team with a action shot of the team in training. This will then have the titles of the director and the name of the documentary fade in with the team training still in the background. It will then move on to a close up of the team training and close ups on the main characters (Lewis Tear and Adrain Briffa) training. the next shot will be them going into the changing rooms and just talking about what they felt about the training sessions they had just done. The film will then move onto the common room and videoing the characters revising and asking them about how they are finding their school life and talking about how they feel about their studies. I will then move on to videoing their teachers and asking them about what they think about the characters and will then carry that on to their coaches and ask them what they think of the players. The documentary will end with a clips of a game where the characters playing and with them walking of into the changing rooms.

Who are the target audience? My target audience will be mainly sports enthusiast with a interest in rugby. This is because my documentary has a specific topic of which not everyone would enjoy but being a documentary and not a film people might like it as it is factual and not fictional. I believe people that are interested in rugby will enjoy watching this short documentary as it is a very specific topic and will learn of life for young sportsmen of today.

Which short films have you looked at to help you get ideas?I used a short film called 'Sign Language' on youtube. I used this as an inspiration for my short film as it is the same length as what my short film will be and it is a documentary. This short film has a few messages that it gets across to its audience like such things as noticing the smaller more beautiful things in life rather than all the big fancy stuff.

What message do you hope the audience will understand from your film?The message i want my audience to understand is that most young people that are involved in sports are happy with their lives but also face a lot of challenges on and off the field. This would be me desired message as i believe that in todays world young people are considered lazy and un-organised which i personally believe to be wrong, i feel that this interpretation of young people is wrong and that there are many young people becoming more mature through sports and having to organise their school work with their sport.

Setting(s): In Ravens Wood school.

Cast:Lewis Tear and Adrain Briffa with other players from the rugby academy

Crew:Ben Dickerson